Seat Belt Evidence and Your Indiana Claim

Insurance adjusters sometimes ask whether an injured person was buckled up before they say anything about the other driver’s mistake. How seat belt use fits into an Indiana claim depends on a statute that changed for claims arising after June 30, 2024. The rule has two parts, and they work differently.

An Unbuckled Belt Is Not Treated as Fault

Under Indiana Code 9-19-10-7, failing to comply with the seat belt requirements does not constitute fault under Indiana’s comparative fault statute, and it does not limit an insurer’s liability. In plain terms, a missing belt isn’t a percentage of blame assigned to the injured person. The question of who caused the crash is still decided on the usual evidence.

Other conduct is a different matter. If the defense argues that the injured person was speeding or ignored a signal, fault sharing can still affect what a claimant recovers.

Belt Use Can Still Come Up When Damages Are Argued

The same statute allows evidence of noncompliance in a civil action to mitigate damages, but only for causes of action that accrued after June 30, 2024, and only for a plaintiff who was at least 15 years old. That is a damages argument, not a fault argument. It asks whether the injuries were worse than they would have been with a belt.

The defense carries the burden, and it has two things to prove:

The injured person did not use the belt as the law requires.
Using the belt would have reduced the injuries.

Both parts take evidence. An adjuster who points to an unfastened belt without showing how the injuries would have differed hasn’t met the statute’s terms.

The Crash Date Decides Which Rule Applies

Because the damages provision applies to causes of action that accrued after June 30, 2024, the date of the collision is the first fact to pin down. That date, along with the injured person’s age, is what a Kokomo car accident lawyer checks before responding to any belt argument.

Dates matter here. A claim that arose before the cutoff isn’t governed by the same damages provision, so the wrong assumption can change the whole conversation with an insurer.

Evidence Should Separate Fault From Injury

A claim where belt use is raised needs records that speak to two different questions. One is how the crash happened. The other is how the injuries occurred.

Records that help on the first question include photographs of the vehicles and the scene, witness statements, and the police report. Records that help on the second include emergency room notes, imaging, and treatment records that describe the injuries in detail. The more precisely those records describe the injuries, the harder it is for a defense to claim that a belt would have changed them. Who caused the crash is decided through the usual process of determining fault in Indiana, which stays separate from the belt question.

Medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering are among the common car accident damages a defense may try to reduce through a belt argument. Keeping a running record of each category, from the first visit onward, makes those reductions easier to challenge.

Commercial Vehicles Add Their Own Questions

When a commercial truck is involved, the belt rules apply to the occupants of the other vehicles in the same way, but the case also raises questions about the driver’s records and the company behind the truck. Those questions get attention from a Kokomo truck accident lawyer alongside the injury evidence.

How We Approach Claims Where Belt Use Is Raised

At Hall-Justice Law Firm LLC, we represent people injured in car accidents, and Susannah Hall-Justice has practiced in Indiana since 1997. When an insurer raises a belt argument, we separate it from fault and look at what the medical and scene evidence shows about the injuries.

Taking Steps Early Protects the Claim

Seat belt questions often arrive in the middle of a claim, after the first medical bills are already in. Keep every record of treatment, photographs of the vehicle’s interior if they were taken, and the name of anyone who saw the crash. Those items are far easier to gather in the first weeks than months later, and they matter if the insurer later tries to reduce the claim. Taking the steps after a crash early also keeps the record consistent.

The sooner those facts are organized, the less room an insurer has to shift the discussion. Anyone hurt in a Kokomo crash whose insurer is pressing a seat belt argument can reach out to a Kokomo car accident lawyer to review the crash date, the injuries, and the evidence before answering the insurer.

https://halljustice.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/BY1A6676-e1761755625295.jpg

Founding Attorney

Susannah Hall-Justice

Recent Reviews

      EXCELLENT  
   Based on 144 reviews 
    
 
 
 
   
 
 
       Posted on Google  
   
   BROOKE EGELHOFF 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Justice was very informative & kind & went above & beyond for me in every way she could . I highly recommend this attorney!!!!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Brendan Whisenant 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Had an initial consult with the paralegal this morning. She was so polite, and very helpful. Listened, took my info and made the process very easy, in an area where I have a tough time finding attorney's. Thank You
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   CHARLIE CIEAZA 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mrs Hall did a great job in helping me get the best outcome for my case. I highly recommend her services.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Bryant Bryan 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I was fortunate to receive help from Susannah and her team. Susannah is a highly knowledgeable expert in her field. Although my requests was relatively straightforward for such an experienced professional, Susannah and her team provided me with outstanding support and answered all of my questions. I recommend discussing your specific situation with Susannah—even if it feels stressful—because she is excellent at analyzing circumstances and presenting clear options and potential actions. I have no doubt that Susannah and her team have the expertise to provide the best insight and guidance in their field.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Jared Marcinkowski 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Process went smoothly
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Luke Beeler 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Susannah Hall-Justice is an amazing attorney! She was on top of things every step of the way and I am very thankful for her!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Mrs. Benjamin 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I am currently a client of hers. I do get nervous going to court or just simply meeting with her as my lawyer because I never had to be in a situation that required me to need a lawyer! I feel safe with Ms. Hall-Justice because you can just tell she has your best interest! She listens, observes and make sure you are heard! I am praying to God I don’t have to look like what I’m going through because it’s stressful and I just want to go back to my regular life with my children!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Markham Coats 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. This attorney is definitely a credit to her craft! She is very personable and never talks down to a client. She makes a person feel like he/she is actually part of what's going on. She negotiated with the prosecutor and i was offered EVERYTHING that I had hoped for and even more! I would definitely hire her again and i highly recommend that you hire her and trust her in what is often a very vulnerable and confusing time.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Joseph Morledge 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. When we needed a Lafayette attorney to represent us for various charges, Susannah was all we could have hoped for. She had several charges dropped immediately and the remaining minor charges diverted for good behavior. After two months of good behavior, all charges were dismissed. Susannah and her assistant Erica were responsive, supportive and above all very effective.  All at very reasonable rates. I have worked as a criminal defense lawyer in the past and I was very impressed.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Devon Jones 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Impressive and refreshing. I called Susannah’s office first thing in the morning to inquire about a minor legal service and left my contact information with her assistant. Susannah personally called me back only a short while later despite how busy she undoubtedly is. It turned out that the legal opinion I required had to be from a practicing attorney in a different state so we didn’t go forward. Still, the fact that she personally returned my call, and was genuinely pleasant and attentive, substantiates her very positive and personal reviews. Not to stray into the negative but what a breath of fresh air compared to most of the attorneys with whom I’ve spoken in this area - routinely terse, rude and bumptious. This (Hall-Justice) is the law office I will call first for any future legal needs. Thank you.